Field Turf Vs Artificial Turf

Of the nfl s 31 stadiums across the country 17 use artificial turf and 14 use natural grass.

Field turf vs artificial turf.

Supplies equipment and maintenance may be more expensive for natural grass fields. Artificial turf is more expensive to install around 850 000 1m per field compared to 50 000 150 000 for native soil fields and it must be replaced every 8 10 years for 500 00. Also artificial turf doesn t freeze in the winter or thin out in the summer. Although many nfl fields still use natural grass the majority use turf.

Cost isn t the only factor to consider when examining artificial turf vs natural grass for baseball. However natural grass fields are better for the environment overall traction on the pitch and might even lessen the chance of injury. There has been a lot of debate to whether synthetic turf fields or natural grass fields are better. The results of the firm s analysis indicate that even though upfront costs for a synthetic turf baseball field might be higher than grass turf will pay long term dividends in the form of less maintenance and extended use over a 10 year period.

Artificial fields have become more popular due to the year round versatility annual upkeep and durability. Artificial fields need replacing every 8 10 years whereas a natural turf field does not need as frequent renovation and can be renovated at a much reduced price compared to an artificial field. With artificial turf students can practice on the field in almost any weather without damaging the ground. As the years go by artificial turf has risen in popularity and use throughout the country.

Artificial turf is easier to maintain doesn t require water or fertilizer and can accommodate a variety of activities. However with the cost of synthetic turf installation and replacement the. Maintaining a natural grass field is slightly more expensive than a turf field but not by a significant margin. Long term costs are less with natural turf fields compared to synthetic turf fields.

Plus if one takes into consideration the 500 000 that must be paid every 8 10 years to replace the carpet of an artificial turf field and the fact that it is at least 250 000 more expensive to implement then using natural grass ends up being cheaper in the short and long run.